[Retros] Are the King and the Rook pieces of what?

Rol, Guus G.A.Rol at umcutrecht.nl
Tue Jan 29 11:17:34 EST 2008

No offense taken. I am aware that the style of my contributions deviates
from the light-footed message exchanges standard on Internet forums. The
reasons for adopting such an analytical style will become apparent once
I move on to the real target of my mission, the Retro Codex conventions.
I feel that I will need to be very cautious and very precise in order to
get any message across that minefield. I am currently still in the
process of constructing appropriate examples before releasing this

Guus Rol.


Van: retros-bounces at janko.at [mailto:retros-bounces at janko.at] Namens
Pastmaker at aol.com
Verzonden: dinsdag 29 januari 2008 14:15
Aan: retros at janko.at
Onderwerp: Re: [Retros] Are the King and the Rook pieces of what?

My apologies to Guus for having missed his accurate remarks on Roberto's
shrewd observation.

Also, no offense was intended in my comment on Guus's discourse. On the
contrary, emails from Guus are among the ones I open immediately. But
as one who has difficulty with the language of formalism, I really don't
always understand them, and I am sometimes unsure if I am responding to
the point that was made.

The problem is not Guus's prose, but my shortcomings in understanding.
Perhaps on those occasions I should simply refrain from replying.


Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/retros/attachments/20080129/ac523bbc/attachment.htm>

More information about the Retros mailing list