AW: [Retros] Messigny 2006

Gerd Wilts g.wilts at
Mon Jul 24 12:44:43 EDT 2006


> BTW, I don't agree that both 2nd HM ex aequo show a Pronkin-AUW

> because it cannot be proven that Ra1 and Nb1 are really Pronkin

> pieces

Only now I notice that Michel wrote in his email with the composing results:
"I forgot to mention than in the Pronkin spirit, the original piece has to
be captured". This explains probably why Pronkins had to be accepted which
are no "real" Pronkins.



More information about the Retros mailing list