[Retros] quite *r*are, that is...

Noam Elkies elkies at math.harvard.edu
Thu Jan 28 01:00:37 EST 2010

Oops -- I wrote:

> One can easily play badly enough to lose by Zugzwang even without

> any pressure from the opponent, e.g. 1 Nh3 2 Rg1?, which is

> quite are in ordinary chess. [...]

That is, quite *rare* (not "are").


More information about the Retros mailing list