[Retros] Interesting debate !

[Christian Poisson]

Are you sure this is Ryan's point of view : he always seems to consider
Etienne's first version and Z. Mach 1929 problem are : "I'll say it again...
cooked!".

best,
Christian
http://christian.poisson.free.fr/problemesis/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas DUPONT" <dupont at agat.univ-lille1.fr>
To: <retros at janko.at>
Sent: Monday, January 11, 1904 12:06 AM
Subject: [Retros] Interesting debate !



> Dear retro-friends,

>

> I mostly agree to Ryan's way of thinking. Why not adding the words

> "extended castling" or "no extended castling" in a cylinder problem (when,

> of course, the validity of the solution is concerned) ?

>

> It would not be revolutionary ! Everybody knows here the terms

"consequent"

> or "a-posteriori". They are used to indicate precisely to the solver in

> which field  he evoluates.

>

> Thus, in my opinion, everything must be done for giving the complete

> exposition (modern status) of a problem.

>

> Nicolas Dupont.

>

> _______________________________________________

> Retros mailing list

> Retros at janko.at

> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros

>