[W126 Coupe] OFF TOPIC - 126 CHASSIS DIESELS 300SD VS 350SD

[RICHARD JAFFE]

Bellamy,

Thanks for the info. So maybe I should expand the envelope to include W 123 cars? Guess I need to drive examples of each and compare.

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: Mister McGoo
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 2:18 AM
To: mbcoupes at mbcoupes.com
Subject: RE: [W126 Coupe] OFF TOPIC - 126 CHASSIS DIESELS 300SD VS 350SD

Rich;

Assuming that you want to stick with the W126 chassis...

Your choices of diesels are:

300SD, 3.0 litre 5 cyl (617.951) 1981 - 1985
300SDL, 3.0 litre 6 cyl (603.961)  1986 & 1987
350SD, 3.5 litre 6 cyl (603.970)  1991
350SDL 3.5 litre 6 cyl (603.970)  1990 & 1991

All of the engines delivered to N. America are turbos.  (In fact, I believe  
that the W126 was not available in diesel version in Germany.  Strange??)

The 5 cyl 300 engine is the workhorse.  Tends to be dirty, oil leaks are  
common.  It will likely run as well on diesel, stove oil or heating oil.  I  
don't know anybody who has tried Macdonald's used deep-fry oil.  Yet.  (The  
non-turbo versions in the W123 would be an ideal candidate to try)

The 6 cyl 300 engine has noticeably more power and runs smoother.  I have  
heard critics say they tend to bend connecting rods but I don't personally  
know of one case.  My experience is with the simiilar engine (603.960) in a  
300D and a 300TD (both W124's).  The station wagon ('87) has abt 400,000Km,  
of which I have put well over 200,000. It just keeps running and running and  
running...

The only one experience I have with the 350 diesel, (which is the same basic  
engine as the 300), was in a W140, not the W126, and at 135,000Km (80,000mi)  
the engine had SERIOUS internal problems.  I have subsequently heard other  
bad experiences with that engine.  But I must emphasize experience with one  
car and a bunch of rumours needs some verification.  Maybe someone else has  
some servicing experience with the 350 diesel.  There are not many around

Hope that is of some help.

-Bellamy


>From: "RICHARD JAFFE" <RSJAFFE at msn.com>
>Reply-To: Mercedes Coupes Mailing Lists <mbcoupes at mbcoupes.com>
>To: <MBCOUPES at MBCOUPES.COM>
>Subject: [W126 Coupe] OFF TOPIC - 126 CHASSIS DIESELS 300SD VS 350SD
>Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 00:15:11 -0400
>
>I'm thinking about getting a diesel as a daily driver. The issue is whether  
>to stick with the 3 ltr 5 cyl turbodiesel (these seem to be pretty bullet  
>proof) or go with the 3.5 ltr 6 cyl turbodiesel (1991 model year). One  
>website mentioned numerous problems with the 3.5 ltr motor that MB did not  
>acknowledge. Anyone have any experience with either of these vehicles?
>
>Rich Jaffe


>The MB Coupes Website!
>W126 SEC Mailing List
>Postings remain property of MB Coupes, L.L.C.


The MB Coupes Website!
W126 SEC Mailing List
Postings remain property of MB Coupes, L.L.C.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/mbcoupes/attachments/20050903/ecb984ed/attachment.html