[LargeFormat] Oh Sheet

[Brock Nanson]

I've done that too... I get caught up in the 'doing' and forget to keep
track of the accounting that goes with keeping track of what is exposed and
what isn't!

As far as the magazines go, no, I don't like to think about that...  I don't
imagine they all kept well with that free living lifestyle!

I haven't done more than thumb through them yet - one evening this winter
I'll read them cover to cover as the content looks interesting (in more ways
than one).

Brock

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Wolz" <wolzphoto@worldnet.att.net>
To: <largeformat@f32.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: [LargeFormat] Oh Sheet


> Brock,
>
> Yep.  And you know what's worse than not knowing whether the film was
> exposed or not?  Shooting the same film twice!  BTDT.
>
> Do you ever think about what those beautiful underclothed young ladies
> in the 1960's Grossbild mags look like now?
>
> My copies even contained an article on the Scheimplug rule - now that's
> being thoughtful, don't you think?
>
> Karl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: largeformat-admin@f32.net [mailto:largeformat-admin@f32.net] On
> Behalf Of Brock Nanson
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:46 PM
> To: largeformat@f32.net
> Cc: rstein@bigpond.net.au
> Subject: [LargeFormat] Oh Sheet
>
> Well, surprisingly enough, Canada Post came through the other day!  My
> prize
> for the Oh Sheet contest!  Let me thank Uncle Dick for the prize, which
> includes two rstein original prints of some interestingly clad females.
> Unfortunately they are unsigned which limit their value on the open art
> market.  However the content is classic U. D. which should be
> identifiable
> by any knowledgeable art appraiser!  Some antique photo magazines
> rounded
> out the prize... clearly Uncle Dick had my best interests in mind as
> they
> both contain some rather pretty skin.
>
> Thanks Uncle Dick!
>
> On another note, I was going through the deepfreeze looking for some
> sheet
> film and came across a ziplock with 4 boxes inside.  Two Velvia, two
> Ilford.
> Normally I would take an empty box to put the exposed film into when
> travelling, so I assumed this was the case.  Sure enough, one Velvia box
> was
> empty, the other had a few sheets left.  Unfortunately there are sheets
> in
> both black and white boxes!!  By date, the oldest box has 14 sheets in
> it
> which suggests they may have been unloaded from 7 holders.  If it was an
> odd
> number I'd assume it could be unexposed... So I guess I'll have to
> process a
> sheet and see if there are images to be had.  I don't recall shooting
> that
> many unaccounted sheets however.
>
> Anyone else outsmart themselves like this?
>
> Brock
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat@f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LargeFormat mailing list
> LargeFormat@f32.net
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/largeformat
>