[LargeFormat] Pre-exposure in the real world

Bob Younger largeformat@f32.net
Fri Jan 4 12:21:10 2002


I think it was to allow the insertion of a ND filter; or to provide more
diffusion and less light; one is probably sufficient if your higher shutter
speeds are accurate; or you're not using the lenscap and hat approach. I've
not used pre-exposure in a long time as most of my work in the last decade
has been color transparency; so no recent experience. Others on the list I
think may provide more insight....

......and Les, I only went to the one workshop; can't claim to have "studied
under....." unfortunately.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy and Marco Milazzo" <mmilazz1@elp.rr.com>
To: <largeformat@f32.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: [LargeFormat] Pre-exposure in the real world


> Bob,
>
> Thanks for that tip, but why TWO pieces of opal glass -- for the
> difusion?.
>
> I've never heard about the time-limit thing, but Adams does emphasize that
> pre-exposure is only for smaller, localized areas of shadows or dark
> values.  He says it gives large areas of shadow a "veiled" look.
>
> Marco
>