[AGL] denial, anger, bargaining, etc.

[Michael Eisenstadt]

Bill Clinton, not Hillary. Remember he was impeached by Congress, 
acquitted by the Senate and handily won re-election. Trump now has a 
great big cudgel to beat up on his opponents next year.

You are in denial and angry. Next comes bargaining, then grief, finally 
acceptance.

The interesting thing for me is who will the Dems nominate. Sen. Bernie 
(I just saw a clip of him reacting to the news) is an old man ranting 
and flapping his arms: no dignity there. I haven't seen a video of it 
but I read that Beto when speaking makes odd arm movements (I didn't 
notice that in his debate with Sen. Cruz that I watched). I suspect that 
no woman will be nominated because they seem to be fueled with 
resentment and proposing impossible programs. Unlike Britain, Germany 
and other countries in the past, America does not have a female 
politician with the gravitas needed.

On 3/25/2019 5:19 PM, Frances Morey wrote:
>  "the way Clinton used the failure of /his/ indictment to win 
> re-election."
> Say whaaaa?!?!? Clinton did not use anything to WIN RE-ELECTION. She 
> wasn't elected nor re-elected.
> The Mueller report was hogtied from the beginning, being limited to a 
> narrow inquiry of Russian election meddling. If it seems like a 
> Nothing Burger it is because that's what it is. What the jury, we the 
> public, knew from what Trump twittered was even more indictable than 
> what Mueller investigation ferreted out. Guilty next case.
> Yet the often repeated lie of "No collusion" "Not Guilty" was repeated 
> so much as to have become the virtual truth.
>
> Best,
> Frances
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:05 PM Michael Eisenstadt 
> <eisenstadt0 at gmail.com <mailto:eisenstadt0 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     As I consider all subscribers to austin ghetto my friends, I write
>     to elicit your honest response to the news that Trump did not
>     conclude with Russia to steal the election. As a Russophile (not
>     that much of Putin although he is a clever ruler) I always
>     believed that the deep state made that charge up in an effort to
>     undo the results of the 2016 election. Amazing that most Americans
>     accepted it to be so /until this weekend/. It is still gospel that
>     Russia hacked the emails of the DNC and gave them to Wikipedia but
>     that allegation has long since been disproved. The large files of
>     purloined emails of the DNC released by Wikipedia show incremental
>     time stamps of 1 or 2 minutes, transfer speeds impossible by
>     hacking through the Internet but consistent with a hard wire
>     downloading of the emails from a computer to a flashdrive.
>     Wikipedia says that they got the files from a disgruntled DNC
>     employee in Washington as the files' time stamps suggest.
>     Wikipedia says further that they did not receive the files from
>     the Russians.
>
>     Trump wil use the exonerating Mueller report in his forthcoming
>     campaign the way Clinton used the failure of his indictment to win
>     re-election. Who will be the Dem. candidate? Some of them are not
>     unlikeable aside their platforms.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20190325/b0a6e9fa/attachment.html>