why 4? Re: Response

Jon Ford austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Wed Sep 1 02:20:02 2004


<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P><BR><BR></P>Sorry you received four-- i only sent one. </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Jon</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&gt;From: Mary Ann Wilson &lt;mbuttons@gate.net&gt; </P>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Reply-To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: &lt;austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: why 4? Re: Response 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:03:08 -0500 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Jon, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I received FOUR of these. One is more than enough. This stuff doesn't belong 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;on list. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;m-a 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;on 8-31-2004 3:13 PM, Jon Ford at jonmfordster@hotmail.com wrote: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Mike-- I'm glad you sent out the email from Jim. Although I had previously 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;received it from you,I tried to interpret it for the guetto2 folk without 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;quoting directly from it, and was met with a hail of hostility; Jim totally 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;denied sending it, suggesting indirectly that you had made it all up. I 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;still maintain that you were&nbsp;&nbsp;dissed in this case by Wayne and Gerry, but 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Wayne is a big-hearted guy, who can get mad at someone and still be a friend 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;(except in my case, in which he totally wiped my out of his email world 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;because of a comment I once made about how white celtic skin is most 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;beautiful of all, whereas I mantain that the "beauty" of skin color is a 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;subjective&nbsp;&nbsp;cultural concept). 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Jon 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;From: "Michael Eisenstadt" &lt;michaele@HotPOP.com&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Reply-To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;To: &lt;austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Subject: Re: Response 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:47:42 -0600 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;From: "Pepi Plowman" &lt;pepstoil@yahoo.com&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;To: &lt;austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Cc: "Ghetto 2" &lt;GHETTO2@LISTSERV.WHATHELPS.COM&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 9:28 PM 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Subject: Re: Response 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Mike, you remind me of Don Quixote, fighting 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; windmills! You want to pick a fight whether there's 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; one there or not! Is this a late midlife crisis, or 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; what?&nbsp;&nbsp;You send a blip out of the blue talking about 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; how you were insulted by an e-mail sent by Jim Strong, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; but you don't forward the e-mail.&nbsp;&nbsp;There's no way to 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; know what Jim meant without seeing it, albeit he 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; rightly figured it was personal. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;It was personal but he posted it both to me and 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;to agl. I should have allowed it to go through but 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;it was so creepy I was ashamed to. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;That was a mistake it seems. Here's his email 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;in its entirety 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;START HERE 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;--- Michael Eisenstadt &lt;michaele@HotPOP.com&gt; wrote: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/469781.html 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; very long interview with Theodorakis the great Greek 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; composer by an Israeli journalist 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; he is full of it just like Jim Strong and others but 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; more nuanced. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; here's a snippet 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;================= 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;reply&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;what a pathetic, whiney little schnorra weasel you 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;are mikey ... i. e. Gai kakhen afenyam .... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;or, in the laternative, go engage in your favorite 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;pasttime - anal (and/or) banal intercourse with your 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;significant other doppleganager ... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;maybe you should try to get another waiter job - 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;and avoid being fired this time for being a flaming 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;asshole with the customers ... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;peace and have another xanax. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;STOP HERE 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;I shouldnt have showed to Madelon as it upset her. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;What set him off I don't know. I said that Theodorakis 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;and Jim Strong and others are full of it. The expression 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;"full of it" seems so anodyne so what set him off? 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Pepi, I want you to know that I take pills for my male 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;menopause and the tests show that it is under control. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;The figures are in range and that's science. Unlike 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;FHR (female hormone replacement) medication ours 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;is distilled from horny stallion pee. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Pepi also said 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; You are developing paranoid conceptualizations, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; as ever, as you enumerate at length friends and 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; acquaintances in consideration of their possible 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; view of you. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;At length? This is so unfair. Jon Ford mistakenly 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;identified Wayne Johnson (40 year friendship) 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;and Gerry Storm as having dissed me on 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;JSDGMLG2. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;I wrote merely to disabuse him of an error. Jon 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;has never even MET Wayne. Gerry I know from 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;the Raw Deal. Jon Ford spoke ONLY of Wayne 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;and Gerry. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;I shoulda stopped there. But at the keyboard a 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;counterbalancing contrast seemed to be needed. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;So I named JS, Simmons, Ted Samsel and 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Fontaine also as folks who really REALLY dont like 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;me. Pepi, that aint paranoid conceptualizations, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;that's simply the way it is. It's only 4 people, it's 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;not a big deal. Sorry it's such a problem for you. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Afterwards Wayne confirmed my claim of friendship. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;And Gerry publicly giggled at Wayne's revelation of the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;LEGUME conspiracy against me. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;You're right about email being an imperfect medium. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;I have always thought that the charm of OUR maillist 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;was that we knew each other in real life and saw 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;one another at parties. So when reading Karen or 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Connie or other folks that we actually know in real life, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;it always strikes me how lifelike their emails are, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;you can almost hearing them speaking, it is SO them. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;As compared to folks one knows ONLY through 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;email. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;I think the problem with my letters is that the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;charm of full self-expression is too tempting for 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;me. My self-expression IS different from the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;usual Texan sensibility, I know that. But my view 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;is that if I find myself living among folks with a 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;more buttoned-up sensibility, the last thing I 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;would do in my whole life would be to adopt it. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Alas, this decision does not easily make me 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;friends nor do I have any ambition to run for 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;elected office. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;It's like Jack Nicholson at the end of the Sean 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Penn directed movie The Pledge where 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Nicholson is sitting on the porch of his lakeside 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;house drinking a beer and arguing with himself 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;with gestures. Or is it? 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;Mike 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;more! &lt;http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2746??PS=47575&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;-- Mary Ann Wilson 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;mbuttons@gate.net 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr> <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2731??PS=47575">Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!</a> </html>