Mr. Laden! Kiss your evil ass goodbye.

[Roger Baker]

JIM BALDAUF wrote:
> 
> I'm in for $10 (out of my special Bush Lawsuit Victory account.)
> C'mon, Roger, I know you've got one too!
> JB
>



Sure I'm good for that, even more if you play your cards right, but 
wouldn't it make sense to buy two years if we quickly overpledg 
enough for one year? (Austin Ghetto seems more sensible...)
 

      *****************************



But screw all; we're now bombing Kabul!!!
 
"Operation enduring freedom"

Britain is tagging along, characteristically. And we aren't 
about to wait around to clear our war against evil with the
United Nations, which is filled with enough peaceniks and 
bleeding hearts to make telebob throw up. 

Now all we have to do is figure out how we know when we've won. 
Maybe we've won when a sudden lack of new newspaper interviews 
proves Mr. Laden is dead? Or until our buildings stop getting 
blown up? Or until we have installed a pro-Bush government? Or 
until the 7 million plus Afghans said to be on the verge of 
starvation and their friends stop hiding in their cowardly caves?
Or until just shy of whenever the Pakistan domino topples?

Did you hear when Bush read from the letter from the four year 
old girl who is willing to make the supreme sacrifice, by 
offering up her father because she "realizes what America is 
all about". 

-- Roger





US opposes United Nations on dealing with terrorism:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/07/international/07COAL.html


"...A sign of Washington's insistence that its hands not be tied was 
its rejection of United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan's 
entreaties that any American military action be subject to Security 
Council approval, administration officials said.
 
At the same time, the Bush administration decided it was not necessary 
to make public its evidence against Osama bin Laden. The White House 
seemed pleased that the British publicly unveiled their version instead.

At first, the Pentagon was even unwilling to have NATO invoke the 
alliance's mutual defense clause requiring members to defend each other 
against an armed attack, senior administration and European officials said.
 
"The allies were desperately trying to give us political cover and the 
Pentagon was resisting it," said one senior administration official. 
"It was insane. Eventually Rumsfeld understood it was a plus, not a minus, 
and was able to accept it."...