US Army Study: Mossad Might Frame Arabs
Wayne Johnson
cadaobh2@brgnet.com
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 08:43:52 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C183B2.4ACC39C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Jim. Let us consider for a moment the history of US "intelligence"
operations. During WWII, German soldiers captured on the Western front
(our front) were always questioned intensively about the Russian battle
plans, if they had served anytime on the other, the Eastern front. Often
times, US Army questioners were much more concerned about the Russian plans
than the German plans.
Later, meaning the period between 1945 and 1948, the British and US
"intellignence" communities (OSS/et al) discovered they had NO spies or
operatives in central Europe, so, in a stroke of brilliant strategic
thinking, they hired ex-Nazi spies and THEIR networks to help them spy on
the Russians. Imagine how pleased these guys were to be on a new, and fat,
payroll. Imagine how eager they were to help their new Masters in THEIR
fight against the Russians. Well, it turns out, that a great deal of the
"missile gap" that played so prominent a role in our politics and economy in
the '50s and '60s were based on grossly inflated figures from these sources.
The Russians didn't have hundreds, they had tens of missiles, five (5) of
which actually had intercontinental capacity. And this was known in some US
sources, but not admitted publically. Much better to keep beating the drum
for massive military buildup...and all those juicy & lucrative weapons
contracts.
Meanwhile, the bright, young remnants of the Third Reich weapons development
built their moon rocket and put an American on the moon.
Is there a pattern here?
Cheers.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net
[mailto:austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net]On Behalf Of JFBaldauf
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:12 AM
To: Wayne Johnson; austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Subject: Re: US Army Study: Mossad Might Frame Arabs
The Mossad is regarded as far more ruthless and far more effective than
our own intelligence agencies. This post is not intended to be a criticism
of the Mossad or Israel (a critiqe of them would be another matter.) It is
instead an example of just how ready our senior military and intelligence
personnel are to consider false flag operations in the mid east. We have
already seen (in Operation Northwoods) how ready they were to conduct a
terror attack against the U.S. to justify an invasion of Cuba in the
sixties.
JB
----- Original Message -----
From: Wayne Johnson
To: JFBaldauf ; austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: US Army Study: Mossad Might Frame Arabs
Well, this is certainly interesting, but I am not sure what value it
brings to The List's understanding of the tension in the Middle East. The
Mossad is no more "ruthless" than most other secret police organizations,
including our own.
Personally, I am ALWAYS suspicious of articles, regardless of source,
which smell subtlely of anti-Israeli/Jewish bias.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net
[mailto:austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net]On Behalf Of JFBaldauf
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:38 PM
To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Subject: Fw: US Army Study: Mossad Might Frame Arabs
This U.S. Army study calls the Mossad a "ruthless and
cunning wildcard" in the Middle East peace equation.
jb
MOSSAD Can Target U.S. Forces, Framing Arabs
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[This article was published the day before the New York and
Washington attacks]
U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army study
by Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
An elite U.S. Army study center has devised a plan for enforcing
a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would require about 20,000
well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a newly created
Palestinian state.
There are no plans by the Bush administration to put American
soldiers into the Middle East to police an agreement forged by the longtime
warring parties. In fact, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is searching
for ways to reduce U.S. peacekeeping efforts abroad, rather than increasing
such missions.
But a 68-page paper by the Army School of Advanced Military
Studies (SAMS) does provide a look at the daunting task any international
peacekeeping force would face if the United Nations authorized it, and
Israel and the Palestinians ever reached a peace agreement. Located at Fort
Leavenworth, Kan., the School for Advanced Military Studies is both a
training ground and a think tank for some of the Army's brightest officers.
Officials say the Army chief of staff, and sometimes the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, ask SAMS to develop contingency plans for future military operations.
During the 1991 Persian Gulf war, SAMS personnel helped plan the coalition
ground attack that avoided a strike up the middle of Iraqi positions and
instead executed a "left hook" that routed the enemy in 100 hours.
The cover page for the recent SAMS project said it was done for
the Joint
Chiefs of Staff. But Maj. Chris Garver, a Fort Leavenworth
spokesman,
said the study was not requested by Washington.
"This was just an academic exercise," said Maj. Garver. "They
were trying to take a current situation and get some training out of it."
The exercise was done by 60 officers dubbed "Jedi Knights," as
all second-year SAMS students are nicknamed.
The SAMS paper attempts to predict events in the first year of a
peace-enforcement operation, and sees possible dangers for U.S. troops from
both sides.
It calls Israel's armed forces a "500-pound gorilla in Israel.
Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza and the West Bank. Known to
disregard international law to accomplish mission. Very unlikely to fire on
American forces. Fratricide a concern especially in air space management."
Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS
officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S.
forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
On the Palestinian side, the paper describes their youth as
"loose cannons; under no control, sometimes violent." The study lists five
Arab terrorist groups that could target American troops for assassination
and hostage-taking.
The study recommends "neutrality in word and deed" as one way to
protect U.S. soldiers from any attack. It also says Syria, Egypt and Jordan
must be warned "we will act decisively in response to external attack."
It is unlikely either of the three would mount an attack. Of
Syria's military, the report says: "Syrian army quantitatively larger than
Israeli Defense Forces, but largely seen as qualitatively inferior. More
likely, however, Syrians would provide financial and political support to
the Palestinians, as well as increase covert support to terrorism acts
through Lebanon."
Of Egypt's military, the paper says, "Egyptians also maintain a
large army but have little to gain by attacking Israel."
The plan does not specify a full order of battle. An Army source
who reviewed the SAMS work said each of a possible three brigades would
require about 100 Bradley fighting vehicles, 25 tanks, 12 self-propelled
howitzers, Apache attack helicopters, Kiowa Warrior reconnaissance
helicopters and Predator spy drones.
The report predicts that non-lethal weapons would be used to
quell unrest.
U.S. European Command, which is headed by NATO's supreme allied
commander, would oversee the peacekeeping operation. Commanders would
maintain areas of operation, or AOs, around Nablus, Jerusalem, Hebron and
the Gaza strip.
The study sets out a list of goals for U.S. troops to accomplish
in the first 30 days. They include: "create conditions for development of
Palestinian State and security of Israel "; ensure "equal distribution of
contract value or equivalent aid" . . . that would help legitimize the
peacekeeping force and stimulate economic growth; "promote U.S. investment
in Palestine"; "encourage reconciliation between entities based on
acceptance of new national identities"; and "build lasting relationship
based on new legal borders and not religious-territorial claims."
Maj. Garver said the officers who completed the exercise will
hold major planning jobs once they graduate. "There is an application
process" for students, he said. "They screen their records, and there are
several tests they go through before they are accepted by the program. The
bright planners of the future come out of this program."
James Phillips, a Middle East analyst at the Heritage
Foundation, said it would be a mistake to put peacekeepers in Israel, given
the "poor record of previous monitors."
"In general, the Bush administration policy is to discourage a
large American presence," he said. "But it has been rumored that one of the
possibilities might be an expanded CIA role."
"It would be a very different environment than Bosnia," said Mr.
Phillips, referring to America's six-year peacekeeping role in
Bosnia-Herzegovina. "The Palestinian Authority is pushing for this as part
of its strategy to internationalize the conflict. Bring in the Europeans and
Russia and China. But such monitors or peacekeeping forces are not going to
be able to bring peace. Only a decision by the Palestinians to stop the
violence and restart talks could possibly do that."
E-mail us at light@iiie.net
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C183B2.4ACC39C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Jim. Let us consider for a moment the history of US =
"intelligence"=20
operations. During WWII, German soldiers captured on the =
Western=20
front (our front) were always questioned intensively about the Russian =
battle=20
plans, if they had served anytime on the other, the Eastern front. =
Often=20
times, US Army questioners were much more concerned about the Russian =
plans than=20
the German plans. </FONT></SPAN></DIV><SPAN =
class=3D920083313-13122001>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Later, =
meaning the=20
period between 1945 and 1948, the British and US "intellignence" =
communities=20
(OSS/et al) discovered they had NO spies or operatives in central =
Europe, so, in=20
a stroke of brilliant strategic thinking, they hired ex-Nazi spies and =
THEIR=20
networks to help them spy on the Russians. Imagine how pleased =
these guys=20
were to be on a new, and fat, payroll. Imagine how eager they were =
to help=20
their new Masters in THEIR fight against the Russians. Well, =
it=20
turns out, that a great deal of the "missile gap" that played so =
prominent a=20
role in our politics and economy in the '50s and '60s were based on =
grossly=20
inflated figures from these sources. The Russians didn't have =
hundreds,=20
they had tens of missiles, five (5) of which actually had =
intercontinental=20
capacity. And this was known in some US sources, but not admitted=20
publically. Much better to keep beating the drum for massive =
military=20
buildup...and all those juicy & lucrative weapons contracts. =20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV></SPAN><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans =
Serif"=20
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Meanwhile, the bright, young remnants of the =
Third Reich=20
weapons development built their moon rocket and put an American on the=20
moon. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Is there a pattern here?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Cheers.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D920083313-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Wayne</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net=20
[mailto:austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net]<B>On Behalf Of=20
</B>JFBaldauf<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:12=20
AM<BR><B>To:</B> Wayne Johnson;=20
austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: US Army Study: =
Mossad=20
Might Frame Arabs<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>The Mossad is =
regarded as far=20
more ruthless and far more effective than our own intelligence =
agencies.=20
This post is not intended to be a criticism of the Mossad or Israel (a =
critiqe=20
of them would be another matter.) It is instead an example of just how =
ready=20
our senior military and intelligence personnel are to consider false =
flag=20
operations in the mid east. We have already seen (in Operation =
Northwoods) how=20
ready they were to conduct a terror attack against the U.S. to justify =
an=20
invasion of Cuba in the sixties.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>JB</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dcadaobh2@brgnet.com =
href=3D"mailto:cadaobh2@brgnet.com">Wayne=20
Johnson</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3DJFBaldauf@prodigy.net=20
href=3D"mailto:JFBaldauf@prodigy.net">JFBaldauf</A> ; <A=20
title=3Daustin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net=20
=
href=3D"mailto:austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net">austin-ghetto-list@pairli=
st.net</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 12, =
2001 8:07=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: US Army Study: =
Mossad=20
Might Frame Arabs</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D420490302-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Well, this is certainly interesting, but I am not sure what =
value it=20
brings to The List's understanding of the tension in the Middle =
East. =20
The Mossad is no more "ruthless" than most other secret police=20
organizations, including our own. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D420490302-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D420490302-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Personally, I am ALWAYS suspicious of articles, regardless =
of source,=20
which smell subtlely of anti-Israeli/Jewish bias. =
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D420490302-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D420490302-13122001><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>Wayne</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net=20
[mailto:austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net]<B>On Behalf Of=20
</B>JFBaldauf<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:38=20
PM<BR><B>To:</B> =
austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> Fw: US=20
Army Study: Mossad Might Frame Arabs<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>This U.S. Army =
study calls the=20
Mossad a "ruthless and </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>cunning</FONT><FONT =
face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2> wildcard" in the Middle East =
peace=20
equation.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>jb</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>
<P> </P></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>
<TABLE>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width=3D119><IMG height=3D104 alt=3D""=20
src=3D"http://www.iiie.net/Images/IIIEMainLogo.gif" =
width=3D104 border=3D2=20
NOSEND=3D"1"></TD>
<TD>
<P align=3Dright><B><FONT size=3D4>MOSSAD Can Target U.S. =
Forces,=20
Framing Arabs</FONT></P>
<HR color=3D#0000ff noShade SIZE=3D5>
</B></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD width=3D119></TD>
<TD><FONT size=3D1>[This article was published <I>the day =
before</I>=20
the New York and Washington attacks]</FONT>=20
<P><STRONG>U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army=20
study</STRONG><STRONG><FONT size=3D2><FONT=20
size=3D1></FONT></FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>by Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times</P>
<P>An elite U.S. Army study center has devised a plan for =
enforcing=20
a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would require =
about=20
20,000 well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a =
newly=20
created Palestinian state.</P>
<P>There are no plans by the Bush administration to put =
American=20
soldiers into the Middle East to police an agreement forged =
by the=20
longtime warring parties. In fact, Defense Secretary Donald =
H.=20
Rumsfeld is searching for ways to reduce U.S. peacekeeping =
efforts=20
abroad, rather than increasing such missions.</P>
<P>But a 68-page paper by the Army School of Advanced =
Military=20
Studies (SAMS) does provide a look at the daunting task any=20
international peacekeeping force would face if the United =
Nations=20
authorized it, and Israel and the Palestinians ever reached =
a peace=20
agreement. Located at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., the School for =
Advanced Military Studies is both a training ground and a =
think tank=20
for some of the Army's brightest officers. Officials say the =
Army=20
chief of staff, and sometimes the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ask =
SAMS to=20
develop contingency plans for future military operations. =
During the=20
1991 Persian Gulf war, SAMS personnel helped plan the =
coalition=20
ground attack that avoided a strike up the middle of Iraqi =
positions=20
and instead executed a "left hook" that routed the enemy in =
100=20
hours.</P>
<P>The cover page for the recent SAMS project said it was =
done for=20
the Joint<BR>Chiefs of Staff. But Maj. Chris Garver, a Fort=20
Leavenworth spokesman,<BR>said the study was not requested =
by=20
Washington.</P>
<P>"This was just an academic exercise," said Maj. Garver. =
"They=20
were trying to take a current situation and get some =
training out of=20
it."</P>
<P>The exercise was done by 60 officers dubbed "Jedi =
Knights," as=20
all second-year SAMS students are nicknamed.</P>
<P>The SAMS paper attempts to predict events in the first =
year of a=20
peace-enforcement operation, and sees possible dangers for =
U.S.=20
troops from both sides.</P>
<P>It calls Israel's armed forces a "500-pound gorilla in =
Israel.=20
Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza and the West =
Bank.=20
Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission. =
Very=20
unlikely to fire on American forces. Fratricide a concern =
especially=20
in air space management."</P>
<P>Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS =
officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has =
capability to=20
target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab=20
act."</P>
<P>On the Palestinian side, the paper describes their youth =
as=20
"loose cannons; under no control, sometimes violent." The =
study=20
lists five Arab terrorist groups that could target American =
troops=20
for assassination and hostage-taking.</P>
<P>The study recommends "neutrality in word and deed" as one =
way to=20
protect U.S. soldiers from any attack. It also says Syria, =
Egypt and=20
Jordan must be warned "we will act decisively in response to =
external attack."</P>
<P>It is unlikely either of the three would mount an attack. =
Of=20
Syria's military, the report says: "Syrian army =
quantitatively=20
larger than Israeli Defense Forces, but largely seen as=20
qualitatively inferior. More likely, however, Syrians would =
provide=20
financial and political support to the Palestinians, as well =
as=20
increase covert support to terrorism acts through =
Lebanon."</P>
<P>Of Egypt's military, the paper says, "Egyptians also =
maintain a=20
large army but have little to gain by attacking Israel."</P>
<P>The plan does not specify a full order of battle. An Army =
source=20
who reviewed the SAMS work said each of a possible three =
brigades=20
would require about 100 Bradley fighting vehicles, 25 tanks, =
12=20
self-propelled howitzers, Apache attack helicopters, Kiowa =
Warrior=20
reconnaissance helicopters and Predator spy drones.</P>
<P>The report predicts that non-lethal weapons would be used =
to=20
quell unrest.</P>
<P>U.S. European Command, which is headed by NATO's supreme =
allied=20
commander, would oversee the peacekeeping operation. =
Commanders=20
would maintain areas of operation, or AOs, around Nablus, =
Jerusalem,=20
Hebron and the Gaza strip.</P>
<P>The study sets out a list of goals for U.S. troops to =
accomplish=20
in the first 30 days. They include: "create conditions for=20
development of Palestinian State and security of Israel "; =
ensure=20
"equal distribution of contract value or equivalent aid" . . =
. that=20
would help legitimize the peacekeeping force and stimulate =
economic=20
growth; "promote U.S. investment in Palestine"; "encourage=20
reconciliation between entities based on acceptance of new =
national=20
identities"; and "build lasting relationship based on new =
legal=20
borders and not religious-territorial claims."</P>
<P>Maj. Garver said the officers who completed the exercise =
will=20
hold major planning jobs once they graduate. "There is an=20
application process" for students, he said. "They screen =
their=20
records, and there are several tests they go through before =
they are=20
accepted by the program. The bright planners of the future =
come out=20
of this program."</P>
<P>James Phillips, a Middle East analyst at the Heritage =
Foundation,=20
said it would be a mistake to put peacekeepers in Israel, =
given the=20
"poor record of previous monitors."</P>
<P>"In general, the Bush administration policy is to =
discourage a=20
large American presence," he said. "But it has been rumored =
that one=20
of the possibilities might be an expanded CIA role."</P>
<P>"It would be a very different environment than Bosnia," =
said Mr.=20
Phillips, referring to America's six-year peacekeeping role =
in=20
Bosnia-Herzegovina. "The Palestinian Authority is pushing =
for this=20
as part of its strategy to internationalize the conflict. =
Bring in=20
the Europeans and Russia and China. But such monitors or=20
peacekeeping forces are not going to be able to bring peace. =
Only a=20
decision by the Palestinians to stop the violence and =
restart talks=20
could possibly do that."</P>
<P align=3Djustify> </P>
<P align=3Djustify><B>E-mail us at <A=20
href=3D"mailto:light@iiie.net?subject=3DWebsite feedback: =
MOSSAD Can Target U.S. Forces, Framing Arabs">light@iiie.net</A>=20
=
</B></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>=
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C183B2.4ACC39C0--