Enrons "problems" part of terrorist plot?

[Roger Baker]

--Apple-Mail-1--966145206
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed

Well you have to admit it all adds up. Here's the background:

In order to continue our fight against terrorism/evil around the world, 
it is
necessary to expand the war to Iraq where the next most evil guy in the
world next to bin Laden (I'm talking about Saddam) is laughing at us 
while
literally wallowing in evil.

Thats why we need a war but the terrorist sympathizers in the press are
telling our plans in Iraq and thus weakening British resolve before we
even finish cleaning up all the evil in Afghanistan. Details below.

So how do the terrorists and their sysmpathizers intend to slow down the
war against evil here in the USA? By focusing on how a few are losing
their jobs, which is part of free enterprise from time to time,  and
--you just watch -- Enron's problems.

The terrorists will next try focus on how Enron CEO Ken Lay giving GWBush
a few million dollars cash, which amounts to free speech, was somehow 
bad.

A company like Enron that buys and sells energy and makes a fair profit
on the difference is a necessary part of keeping the whole capitalist 
system
working properly, and it took someone with the vision of Ken Lay to 
figure that
out and use this brilliant insight as the basis to get loans to grow his 
company.

But every business has a few cash problems from time to time, and 
pro-terrorist
publicity caused everyone to call in their chips at the same time, 
forcing Enron
to unexpectly have to borrow billions to cover all the loans and 
countless
ordinary people to lose their retirement pensions.

In fact, the best financial minds in the country were involved in 
running Enron
like just for instance, Sen. Phil Gramm's wife Wendy Lee Gramm, who 
helped
deregulate energy in the early 1990's so that capitalism could be more 
efficient
is on Enron's board of directors. Her husband Phil used to teach 
economics here
in Texas so in a sense you got a team in charge there to help Enron make
free enterpise work so it could get enough credit loan money to all its 
partners
using future energy profits as collateral for investments all around the 
world to
help keep the company growing so they could make everyone else free.
And help the rest of the world have modern democratic ideas and not 
terrorist
sympathizers who hate freedom.

So lets keep our eye on the ball rolling along the road to freedom and 
not get
distracted by the terrorist symphasizers in the liberal press trying to 
distract
us with stuff like Enron but who would never have enough courage to bomb
Baghdad so the whole country will rise up against Saddam. Because we
love freedom and its not about oil, by the way, which is another favorite
terrorist claim because Iraq has so much of it.  -- Roger

                          **************************************

http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,610461,00.html

	Secret US plan for Iraq war

Bush orders backing for rebels to topple Saddam
War on Terrorism: Observer special

Peter Beaumont, Ed Vulliamy and Paul Beaver
Sunday December 2, 2001
The Observer

America intends to depose Saddam Hussein by giving armed support to 
Iraqi opposition forces across the country, The Observer has learnt.

President George W. Bush has ordered the CIA and his senior military 
commanders to draw up detailed plans for a military operation that could 
begin within months.

The plan, opposed by Tony Blair and other European Union leaders, 
threatens to blow apart the increasingly shaky international consensus 
behind the US-led 'war on terrorism'.

It envisages a combined operation with US bombers targeting key military 
installations while US forces assist opposition groups in the North and 
South of the country in a stage-managed uprising. One version of the 
plan would have US forces fighting on the ground.

Despite US suspicions of Iraqi involvement in the 11 September attacks, 
the trigger for any attack, sources say, would be the anticipated 
refusal of Iraq to resubmit to inspections for weapons of mass 
destruction under the United Nations sanctions imposed after the Gulf 
war..."

--Apple-Mail-1--966145206
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII

<fontfamily><param>Geneva</param>Well you have to admit it all adds
up. Here's the background:


In order to continue our fight against terrorism/evil around the
world, it is 

necessary to expand the war to Iraq where the next most evil guy in
the 

world next to bin Laden (I'm talking about Saddam) is laughing at us
while 

literally wallowing in evil. 


Thats why we need a war but the terrorist sympathizers in the press are

telling our plans in Iraq and thus weakening British resolve before we 

even finish cleaning up all the evil in Afghanistan. Details below.


So how do the terrorists and their sysmpathizers intend to slow down
the 

war against evil here in the USA? By focusing on how a few are losing

their jobs, which is part of free enterprise from time to time,  and 

--you just watch -- Enron's problems. 


The terrorists will next try focus on how Enron CEO Ken Lay giving
GWBush

a few million dollars cash, which amounts to free speech, was somehow
bad.


A company like Enron that buys and sells energy and makes a fair
profit 

on the difference is a necessary part of keeping the whole capitalist
system 

working properly, and it took someone with the vision of Ken Lay to
figure that 

out and use this brilliant insight as the basis to get loans to grow
his company. 


But every business has a few cash problems from time to time, and
pro-terrorist

publicity caused everyone to call in their chips at the same time,
forcing Enron 

to unexpectly have to borrow billions to cover all the loans and
countless 

ordinary people to lose their retirement pensions. 


In fact, the best financial minds in the country were involved in
running Enron

like just for instance, Sen. Phil Gramm's wife Wendy Lee Gramm, who
helped 

deregulate energy in the early 1990's so that capitalism could be more
efficient 

is on Enron's board of directors. Her husband Phil used to teach
economics here

in Texas so in a sense you got a team in charge there to help Enron
make

free enterpise work so it could get enough credit loan money to all
its partners 

using future energy profits as collateral for investments all around
the world to 

help keep the company growing so they could make everyone else free.  

And help the rest of the world have modern democratic ideas and not
terrorist 

sympathizers who hate freedom. 


So lets keep our eye on the ball rolling along the road to freedom and
not get 

distracted by the terrorist symphasizers in the liberal press trying
to distract 

us with stuff like Enron but who would never have enough courage to
bomb 

Baghdad so the whole country will rise up against Saddam. Because we

love freedom and its not about oil, by the way, which is another
favorite 

terrorist claim because Iraq has so much of it.  -- Roger


                         **************************************


<underline><color><param>1A1A,1A1A,FFFF</param>http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,610461,00.html</color></underline>


	Secret US plan for Iraq war 


Bush orders backing for rebels to topple Saddam<underline><color><param>0000,3333,6666</param>

War on Terrorism: Observer special</color></underline> 


Peter Beaumont, Ed Vulliamy and Paul Beaver

Sunday December 2, 2001<underline><color><param>0000,3333,6666</param>

The Observer</color></underline> 


America intends to depose Saddam Hussein by giving armed support to
Iraqi opposition forces across the country, The Observer has learnt. 


President George W. Bush has ordered the CIA and his senior military
commanders to draw up detailed plans for a military operation that
could begin within months. 


The plan, opposed by Tony Blair and other European Union leaders,
threatens to blow apart the increasingly shaky international consensus
behind the US-led 'war on terrorism'. 


It envisages a combined operation with US bombers targeting key
military installations while US forces assist opposition groups in the
North and South of the country in a stage-managed uprising. One
version of the plan would have US forces fighting on the ground. 


Despite US suspicions of Iraqi involvement in the 11 September
attacks, the trigger for any attack, sources say, would be the
anticipated refusal of Iraq to resubmit to inspections for weapons of
mass destruction under the United Nations sanctions imposed after the
Gulf war..." </fontfamily>
--Apple-Mail-1--966145206--