[Retros] rights & ocassions / not answering Andrew anymore

Joost de Heer joost at sanguis.xs4all.nl
Thu Jun 5 07:00:59 EDT 2014

On Thu, June 5, 2014 12:32, afretro wrote:
> In an article published almost a decade ago in
> feenschach, Kornilov and I noted that the limits of fairy chess had
> been expanded to such an extent (there are types in which there is no
> mate, like Losing Chess, etc) that it wouldN't come as a surprise if one
> day someone declared card games a form of fairy chess.

I once jokingly called draughts 'a form of fairy chess':



More information about the Retros mailing list