[Retros] rights & ocassions / not answering Andrew anymore
Joost de Heer
joost at sanguis.xs4all.nl
Tue Jun 3 10:10:20 EDT 2014
On Wed, May 28, 2014 16:16, Olli Heimo wrote:
> Hi Joost-
> I can't decide if I agree or disagree. The Codex says: "Article 18 -
> Repetition of Position
> A position is considered as a draw if it can be proved that an identical
> position  has occured three times in the proof game combined with the
Semantics, but "is considered as a draw" isn't the same as "is a draw".
IMO the wording of the article doesn't imply an automatic end of the game.
More information about the Retros