[Retros] Two-pawns chess

[Joost de Heer]

On 09/13/2012 01:05 AM, Eric Angelini wrote:

> Hello retro Fans,

> my apologizes for the following off-topic idea.

> Imagine an orthodox game of chess

> with orthodox rules + just one unorthodox rule:

> - if your opponent captures a second

> pawn (of yours), you have lost the game.

> Has this been already analysed, tried,

> played between friends?


For the sake of composition (in particular proofgames): Is threatening to 
capture the second pawn considered to be a check? I found out after publishing 
an extinction chess proofgame that the original definition didn't define check.

Joost