[Retros] Solidarity chess (=SC)
elkies at math.harvard.edu
Thu Dec 20 11:48:53 EST 2012
Francois Labelle <flab at wismuth.com> writes:
> Thanks. I managed to screw up my example (the WK should be put
> elsewhere to prevent 1.Rxh1 gxh1=Q+),
I was wondering about that...
> but you get the idea: a mate in n can become a draw (just remove the
> WR from my diagram),
or keep it (as a superfluous piece, yes).
> or it can become a win in n+1 if we feel like composing a bit.
"n+1" is the normal situation; you probably meant either "n+2",
is one simple setup, or "more than n+1", which can also exceed n+2
if we feel like composing a bit more, e.g.
Or we could amend the stalemate law...
More information about the Retros