[Retros] shortest Madrasi PG stalemate ended - Solution

[Nicolas.Dupont at math.univ-lille1.fr]

Andrew said :


> I am sure that Nicolas would *only* propose a proof game which is

> dual-free


This is indeed my aim ! But I can't be sure as I haven't tried to run
Popeye on it (probably too long for that prog).

I will give the intended solution in a couple of days.

Nicolas.



> --- raosorio at fibertel.com.ar wrote:

>

>>

>>

>> Hi Nicolas,

>> 12.0 moves seems to be quite short to get the stalemate task without

>> the e.p. trick.

>> We could manage both records (with and without e.p.) after you

>> publish your PG.

>>

>> On the other hand, Joost's idea of the non-dual free shortest play is

>> good. The point is

>> that the f pawn has to be eliminated as pointed out by Andrew so it

>> seems to be hard

>> to improve the 6.5 moves. Perhaps this idea will function with the

>> non-e.p. case.

>> Is your PG dual free?

>>

>> Best,

>> Roberto

>>

>> >> Nicolas.Dupont at math.univ-lille1.fr writes:

>>

>> >> In my game in 12.0, each unit of one side is Madrasi-blocked

>>

>> >> (in particular, no "ep trick"). Is it possible to construct

>>

>> >> a shorter one with that condition ?

>>

>> >

>>

>> > Every unit, or just every unit that would be mobile in orthodox

>> chess?

>>

>>

>> Every unit (in one side) is either blocked in the orthodox sense, or

>> Madrasi-controlled (that is by a piece of the other side and of the

>> same

>> nature).

>>

>> Nicolas.

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Retros mailing list

>> Retros at janko.at

>> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros

>>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Retros mailing list

> Retros at janko.at

> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros

>