[Retros] DR vs forced ep: what rule predominates?

Otto Janko otto at janko.at
Tue Aug 28 12:58:46 EDT 2007


What about an "a posteriori" validation of a dead position? E.g. a move
validates that the position before this move was dead. Can anyone construct
such a problem?

~ÔttÔ~


_____

From: retros-bounces at janko.at [mailto:retros-bounces at janko.at] On Behalf Of
Pastmaker at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:37 PM
To: retros at janko.at
Subject: Re: [Retros] DR vs forced ep: what rule predominates?




Please note than under rule 5.1, resignation ends the game immediately no
matter who was on the move. Would one read Rule 3.7(d) to require an e.p.
capture that was available and being contemplated by a player whose
opponent, after making the two-square advance, resigned immediately
thereafter?

Tom


**************************************
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/retros/attachments/20070828/032e5a2d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Retros mailing list