[Retros] I'll say it again...cooked!

[geismann at gcr.com]

I would be interested in Jörg Kuhlmann's view on this subject ...

Regards
Bernhard



                                                                                                                                   
                      "Kevin Begley"                                                                                               
                      <kevin_begley at ho         To:      <retros at janko.at>                                                          
                      tmail.com>               cc:                                                                                 
                      Sent by:                 Subject: [Retros] I'll say it again...cooked!                                       
                      retros-admin at jan                                                                                             
                      ko.at                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                   
                      05.09.2002 13:09                                                                                             
                      Please respond                                                                                               
                      to retros                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                   




It seems to me that Ryan has it right.

Problems which predated improvements in the rules of vertical-cylinder,
which were correct in their day, but cooked after the emergence (read:
discovery) of 2 new castling possibilities, should be viewed, quite simply,
as "cooked."

Which is to say, if they cannot live up to today's accepted rules for the
condition, they should not be viewed as vertical-cylinder problems (either
the diagrams should be corrected, or some additional fairy conditions must
be attached to them).

There is some precedent to this, of course, to be found in chess problems
which predate rule changes in the game itself. Problems which were
published prior to the adoption of the en passant rule, for example, cannot
be considered sound if they no longer live up to today's rules. We have a
long history of correcting such problems, and of course, crediting the
original author (yes, an author's good problems can live beyond even
discoveries which alter the very rules of play). When corrections are
impossible, merely stipulate the additional conditions below the diagram
(e.g., "en passant capture is not allowed").

It is therefore important that the rules of a new fairy condition be
carefully considered by the creator -- special case situations (castling,
en passant, promotion) should be clearly defined!  Had the creator of
vertical-cylinder foreseen the possibility that multiple interpretations of
the castling rules could be applied to his cylinder, we might have avoided
the need to correct 70 years worth of problems (which also failed to notice
these possibilities!).  Which is to say, the author should have correctly
realized that the 4 castling options naturally "shake-out" of the simple
rule change he intends to apply ("first and last columns are adjacent," as
defined by Problemesis).

We cannot deny that some rules will naturally evolve over time. When the
tide of discovery washes away a cherished castle, we simply must endeavor
to rebuild it. It does not serve the previous architect to curse the moon
(for the tide).

Kevin Begley.
kevin_begley at hotmail.com