[W126 Coupe] SLS Coupe
wjs
wjs201 at optonline.net
Fri Oct 30 11:11:50 EDT 2009
A little too much bile overall, Dave, but I'm with you.
Jack
1987 SEC
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Oh please, *another* retro product? And the proportions look all
> wrong to me, but that's just personal taste.
> I wonder if we live in a time which will be looked back upon with
> pity, as the auto makers ran out of ideas
> to innovate with style, instead insisting to keep on re-hashing old
> ideas, and selling them for ludicrous
> amounts of money, not on merit, but because of the "spirits of old"
> which are evoked by the new cars,
> which are not at all the same thing.
>
> The 1954 300SL Gullwing had a sound technical reason for the
> gullwing doors, in fact, they were a humongous
> compromise enforced upon the styling department by the engineering
> department, who had to make the best
> of the situation.
>
> It makes me so mad when styling fakery are employed to make a car
> resemble something it's not. Another prime
> example is the current MINI Cooper S, with the very prominent fake
> air intake on the bonnet leading to nowhere (not
> even just channeling extra air to the engine - I mean, they may as
> well have left a "hole") just because they switched
> over from the supercharger the previous generation used, to a
> turbocharger. It's sad to see that Mercedes benz is also
> now (and have been, for a while) in the fake styling business, with
> fake plastic air intakes etc. to make a design look
> "aggressive" or "balanced".
>
> No sir, I am 100x more excited by my 1990 560SEC, which was actually
> forward-looking and original, than by the prospect
> of a "new" SLS coupe 300SL rip-off, with ridiculous fake gullwing
> doors.
>
> Sorry for the rant... had to get it out of my system :-)
>
>
> On 28 Oct 2009, at 6:32 PM, Flodur2 at aol.com wrote:
>
>> If the coupe is here, can the roadster be far behind? I had a hard
>> time getting into the old 300 SL coupe and my at-the-time
>> girlfriend an even harder time. A roadster with a retracting hard
>> top (NOT a one-piece removable top) would be a considered by me
>> whereas the coupe version would not.
>>
>> Rudy Boentgen
>> The MB Coupes Website!
>> W126 SEC Mailing List
>> Postings remain property of MB Coupes, L.L.C.
>
> The MB Coupes Website!
> W126 SEC Mailing List
> Postings remain property of MB Coupes, L.L.C.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/mbcoupes/attachments/20091030/4a0dc14d/attachment.html>
More information about the MBCOUPES
mailing list