[W126 Coupe] 2.82 Rear Diff for 84 500SEC

[Jonathan]

Interesting, as when driving around on a 2.82 I find the cars RPM on the 
highway livable, but it makes me less inclined to want to do serious 
highway driving.  I find the 2.82 makes a Large difference over the 
stock 2.47 acceleration wise, very perceptible IMHO, esp. when you have 
the opportunity to swap back and forth from stock to modified.

Here are some plots using Dan's MPHvsRPM Excel chart:

http://blueridgemb.com/stockdiffrpm.jpg

http://blueridgemb.com/307diffrpm.jpg

Now if I could run Eddie's Gear Vendors or once we get the 5/6sp 
conversion done I'll be all for a 3.07, or even 3.47:)

Jonathan


Gerry Van Zandt wrote:

> The 3.07 isn't all that bad in highway driving. At 80 MPH you're doing 

> EXACTLY 3,500-3,550 RPM; at 65 it runs around 3,000 RPM.  Redline for 

> a 560 is what, 6K or a little higher -- there's plenty of headroom.  I 

> drive my 89 560SEC from Portland up to Seattle quite regularly (a 2.5 

> hour trip) and it's really not a problem.  

>

> I'm still getting upwards of 15 MPG average per tankful.  The last 

> tankful, all highway driving, was 17.59 MPG with the 3.07.  16 and 17 

> MPG for tankfuls with all-freeway driving are not at all uncommon.

>

> The benefit at low speeds and off the line far outweighs the engine 

> running 700 RPM higher at 80 MPH, compared to a stock 2.47 car.

>

> An 84 500SEC or a 380SEC is a direct bolt-up for a 3.07 from a sedan. 

> The later cars (560s) require some slight mods -- the 3.07 gearset 

> must be placed in a 560 pumpkin.  You do have to calibrate the speedo 

> with an adjustment box.  Mine was about 10-12 MPH off.  This is easy 

> to do and you can tuck it behind the instrument cluster back in the dash.

>

> A 2.82 is a good compromise in terms of ratio, but it's not enough of 

> a difference, IMHO, to warrant the time and cost of doing a 

> replacement.  The 3.07 is a large jump and the results are dramatic.  

> If one is doing the swap for better off the line quickness and such, 

> I'd just go whole hog.  Those of us who have done the switch wouldn't 

> go back.

>

> Cheers,

> Gerry

>

>

>

> On Jul 20, 2007, at 9:15 AM, mbcoupes-request at mbcoupes.com 

> <mailto:mbcoupes-request at mbcoupes.com> wrote:

>

>>

>> As an aside, if you do a Lot of highway driving you might find the 3.07

>>

>> from a 450 a bit Busy...granted it will feel Great off the line though!

>>

>>

>> Jonathan

>>

>>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> The MB Coupes Website!

> W126 SEC Mailing List

> Postings remain property of MB Coupes, L.L.C.



-- 
Blue Ridge Mercedes
Offering Enthusiast Service, Restoration and Modification.
Providing quality parts to discriminating customers in all parts of the world.
Located in the Greater Atlanta area.
http://www.blueridgemb.com

1996 S600 Euro "Scharnhorst"
1991 560 SEC Full Euro ECE
1991 560 SEC 226Hp/271ft/lbs
1989 560 SEC AMG (N.A. Conversion 250/297)
1987 560 SEC 
1986 560 SEL 6.0L 32V AMG
1985 300 CD (for sale)
1980 280 SE Euro
1986 560 SEC (parts)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/mbcoupes/attachments/20070722/658925b0/attachment.htm>