[LargeFormat] Re: rainbows, was R O Y G B I V

[Vincent Dobson]

Also consider this, please -- I saw beautiful color un-enhanced photographs
colorful (taken in he winter) of that Moonbow I spoke of in that previous
post.  That exposure was 3 minutes long!  Does this not pretty much debunk
the anti-long exposure theory presented herewith.

Vince Dobson
Visions In Nature
www.VisionsInNature.com

:>-----Original Message-----
:>From: largeformat-admin@f32.net [mailto:largeformat-admin@f32.net]On
:>Behalf Of philip lambert
:>Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:20 AM
:>To: largeformat@f32.net
:>Subject: Re: [LargeFormat] Re: rainbows, was R O Y G B I V
:>
:>
:>I probably used an exposure of about 1/250 for the shot of the
:>rainbow that
:>disappointed.  The rainbow lasted five minutes, maybe less. I
:>can't see how
:>a shorter shutter speed would achieve an improvement. :>
:>