[LargeFormat] Biggest is Best Maybe?

Jim Hemenway largeformat@f32.net
Wed Jun 25 20:07:30 2003


Ok, 20s or 30s.  I guess that's why the prospect a moving a 20x24 off
into the woods doesn't appeal to me at age 61. 

I joke with people who ask me when I'm out with the 11x14, that there
are no good photographs more than 100 feet from the car but actually I'm
good for walking about 10 minutes with it, an LL Bean bag with three
film holders, etc., and the Majestic tripod. 
-- 

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com



Les Newcomer wrote:
> 
> If I remember by college history of photography, WHJ was 99 when he
> died in '42,  so he would have been in his 30's or late 20s. I think
> his foray's in to Yellowstone was in 1870-1874 ish and it was his
> photographs that help bring about the National park system. Yellowstone
> was the first and was designated as such July 4th, 1876.   I only know
> this as I was there 100 years later, armed with only an Argus C-3 I'm
> ashamed to say.
> 
> Les
> 
> On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 01:45  PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:
> 
> > How old was he at the time he used the 20x24?
> > --
> >
> > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Les Newcomer wrote:
> >>
> >> that's what I always admired about William Henry Jackson..   He used a
> >> 20x24 wet plate camera in Yellowstone!, and I doubt he shot from the
> >> parking lot either.
> >>
> >> Les
> >