[IETF-IDRM] Fwd: Re: [IDRM] DRM Taxonomy work -- drm framework...

Thomas Hardjono thardjono@mediaone.net
Wed, 23 May 2001 14:31:29 -0400


>Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:48:16 +1000
>From: Renato Iannella <renato@iprsystems.com>
>Subject: Re: [IDRM] DRM Taxonomy work -- drm framework...
>To: ietf-idrm@lists.elistx.com
>X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.7 (MacOS)
>List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-idrm-help@lists.elistx.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:ietf-idrm@lists.elistx.com>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-idrm-request@lists.elistx.com?body=subscribe>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-idrm-request@lists.elistx.com?body=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-idrm>
>List-Help: <http://lists.elistx.com/elists/admin_email.shtml>,
>  <mailto:ietf-idrm-request@lists.elistx.com?body=help>
>
>
>
>--On 21/5/01 10:00 AM -0700 Mark Baugher wrote:
>
>>I think that
>>there is often some entity in the chain that has special claims
>>(such as legally owning the content) that is distinct from the
>>current "content holder."
>
>Yes, and like copyright, is usually jurisdiction-based.
>
>For example, many countries now have Moral Rights (see Australian
>version at [1]). In this case, as the author of content that
>I sold *all* rights to a Publisher, I still can make claims to
>protect my reputation (for example).
>
>
>Cheers...Renato                       <http://purl.net/net/renato>
>Chief Scientist, IPR Systems Pty Ltd       <http://iprsystems.com>
>
>[1] http://www.copyright.org.au/PDF/InfoSheets/G043v08.pdf