[AGL] did Biden really win?

[Frances Morey]

Here's the key to it all.
"Biden’s otherworldly 80 million votes are being explained away as hatred
for President Trump. The media will have you believe that Americans were
spurred into action, not to vote *for* Joe Biden, but to vote *against* the
Bad Orange Man. President Trump, they say, is such a loathsome figure that
a record number of Americans had no choice but to vote against him."

What's beyond this obvious truth is laughable. The irregularities up and
down the ballot are additional evidence of how alienating Trump's presence
in office turned out to be. He managed to offend 7 million people! Of that
I am assured. I am also reassured that the voters outpouring of
participation was prompted by Trump's lackadaisical style of governing.
That only was deemed pleasing to the opportunity grasping 1% who cleaned up
through the relaxation of regulations, and the Robber Baron style of
gathering up money in every way possible.

But Mike, did you weep? That's the real question I have. I personally know
hundreds who wept when Trump won in 2016 by some 70,000 votes in select
precincts of crucial Electoral States, designed to counter HRC's
popularity. I have heard of no one moved to weep at Trump's more recent
loss. Anger, yes, sadness, not evident. His voters, while a significant
number, were 7 Million behind. That's democracy at work ridding us of the
monstrous Trump, more so than an enthused outpouring for Biden.

Best,
Frances

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 9:48 AM Michael Eisenstadt <eisenstadt0 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I was disappointed that Trump did not win re-election. Die-hard
> pro-Trumpers immediately cried foul alleging massive fraud. As uninformed
> as the average 'Merican, I didn't know what to believe. The lawsuits that
> the Trump party have initiated have gone nowhere. So far as I can tell, no
> smoking gun has been revealed to prove
> *massive *fraud that changed the outcome. No one denies that petty fraud
> was committed as that is in the long-time tradition of American elections.
> AG Burr reported to Trump that no evidence of fraud substantial enough to
> affect the election had been discovered by the Justice Dept.
>
> However there are a number of indices that something is rotten in the
> state of Denmark to quote the Bard in regard to this election. The
> following essay by Peter D'Abrosca marshalls a number of statistics that
> make the results of this election literally impossible.
>
> Here is what he wrote -
>
> Over the past month, thousands of detailed voter fraud claims have stemmed
> from the contested November 3 presidential election.
>
> Americans are discussing the intricacies of software algorithms used by
> the now-infamous Dominion Voting Systems. There has been scrutiny of the
> insecure chain of custody of mail-in ballots and the signature verification
> process for those ballots. In several cases, the poll-watching that
> normally regulates vote tallying appears to have excluded Republicans.
> There’s plenty of evidence that Joe Biden secured the reliably Democratic
> necromancers’ union vote, and that unregistered voters and felons voted
> illegally. Postal workers have come forward claiming they were told to
> backdate ballots if ballots were postmarked after Election Day.
>
> But while many complex pieces of evidence outlined in sworn affidavits and
> presented by lawyers are certainly necessary for the court battles that lie
> ahead, the court of public opinion is perhaps a more important battleground.
>
> If the public at large thinks that Republican claims of voter fraud are,
> in the parlance of our times, malarkey, the courts will be less likely to
> hear Republicans’ cases or rule in Republicans’ favor. Bucking the public
> sentiment is not easy, even for judges who have sworn to remain impartial
> and rule in a manner consistent with facts.
>
> President Trump senses this. It’s why he described
> <https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-11-29/trump-gives-first-interview-since-election>
> the need for a “brave judge, or justice” to hear his cases.
>
> So instead of getting lost in the minutia, it might work in Republicans’
> favor, especially in the court of public opinion, to harp on the *prima
> facie* case for voter fraud.
>
> On that front, the obvious place to start is with Joe Biden’s vote
> total—supposedly a whopping 80 million. It’s a staggering number and one
> that could be called “unbelievable,” in the true sense of that word.
>
> That is close to 15 million more votes than Hillary Clinton received in
> 2016.
>
> Was Joe Biden, whose handful of campaign events featured around 12 or so
> people trapped in COVID circles, or a few parked cars honking their horns,
> inspiring enough to garner 15 million more voters than Hillary? Was he a
> masterful debater who significantly outperformed Clinton on that national
> stage? Could he put two sentences together without getting confused? Does
> he know what planet he’s on? Probably not.
>
> By contrast, President Trump spearheaded an outright revolution against
> the political class in 2016, invigorating millions to attend his rallies
> and sparking a movement that—no matter the outcome of the 2020 race—will be
> a force in American politics for decades to come. The energy and enthusiasm
> of the original Trump campaign are unmatched in modern political history.
> Still, in 2016, he only outperformed Mitt Romney’s 2012 vote total by about
> two million votes.
>
> Worth noting, Joe Biden also surpassed Barack Obama’s 2008 vote total of
> 69 million by about 11 million votes. Even Democrats and the media (but I
> repeat myself) seem unwilling to argue that Joe Biden was a more exciting
> or inspiring candidate than his top-of-the-ticket running mate.
>
> Both the improbable vote totals and the candidates’ enthusiasm gap serve
> as clear-cut, *prima facie* evidence of fraud.
>
> Biden’s otherworldly 80 million votes are being explained away as hatred
> for President Trump. The media will have you believe that Americans were
> spurred into action, not to vote *for* Joe Biden, but to vote *against*
> the Bad Orange Man. President Trump, they say, is such a loathsome figure
> that a record number of Americans had no choice but to vote against him.
>
> But that’s not really true.
>
> President Trump garnered 74 million votes this year. That’s about 11
> million more than he won in 2016. While President Trump’s popularity
> significantly and demonstrably increased among the voting populace, a
> record-breaking number of people also voted against him? That assertion is
> ridiculous on its face.
>
> Here’s more *prima facie* evidence of fraud from pollster Richard Baris
> of Big Data Poll.
>
> “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the
> country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia,” Baris
> said
> <https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/11/14/democracy-institute-pollster-yes-i-think-this-election-was-stolen-n2579970>
> .
>
> Biden also underperformed Clinton in New York City by a wide margin, and
> the only exception to Baris’ rule was Los Angeles, where Biden received
> about 600,000 more votes than Clinton did in 2016. The pair virtually tied
> in Chicago.
>
> But in all of the major cities in the four most important swing states,
> Joe Biden managed to crush Hillary Clinton (a typo for Donald Trump?). How
> convenient.
>
> And what about those down-ballot races? We were promised a Blue Wave by
> Democrats, and in 2018 a Red Wave by Republicans. Each side was supposed to
> mop the floor with the other, up and down the ballot. That’s not what
> happened.
>
> Somehow, Joe Biden’s supposed 80 million vote insurgency didn’t manage to
> matriculate to Democrats down-ballot. In such polarizing times, that
> doesn’t add up.
>
> In fact, in 2018, when Donald Trump was *not* at the top of the ballot,
> Republicans lost 40 seats in the House. In 2020, when Donald Trump *was*
> at the top of the ballot, they gained 12 House seats, suggesting that his
> presence on the ballot galvanized Republicans.
>
> And those hundreds of sworn affidavits mentioned above, each of which
> testifies under penalty of perjury to some kind of voting irregularity?
> Those affidavits themselves are *prima facie* evidence of voter fraud.
>
> Unless hundreds of Americans from every corner of the country have
> conspired to lie under oath on behalf of President Trump, risking their
> liberty to cheat the Democrats out of victory, the sheer number of
> documented irregularities cannot be ignored. If these claims are indeed
> fabricated, they would comprise the single largest conspiracy in the
> history of American electoral politics.
>
> Republicans are ready to bring detailed evidence of voter fraud to court.
> That’s great.
>
> But first, they must win in the court of public opinion by bull horning
> the glaring, *prima facie* irregularities of the 2020 election cycle for
> the entire nation to see.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20201205/e03d779e/attachment.html>