[AGL] Where we are now

[Frances Morey]

Of course, I am for strong borders. But I want a president who isn't as
shallow as a murderers grave who will look for solutions beyond killing
refugees who are stampeding this way! I want a president who recognizes
what went wrong in Central and South America, which was out doing and set
to fix that problem. That might involve reversing our stand on the War on
Drugs, sending "advisors" to those countries and monetary assistance to the
people there to form stronger grassroots policy. Whatever it takes for
Christs-sakes.
Best,
Frances

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM Michael Eisenstadt <eisenstadt0 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Oh, are you for border control now?
>
> Yes, Trump, the anti-semite, whose beloved daughter converted to Judaism
> to marry her Jewish husband. Trump, in his charming frankness, said that he
> preferred to have little guys wearing yamakas do his books. Let me
> translate that for you. Little guys wearing yamakas are religious jews of
> scrupulous honesty (as required by their religion). That's anti-semitism? I
> italicized your astounding misreading of his words below.
>
> On 7/19/2019 1:58 PM, Frances Morey wrote:
>
> You have bully tendencies. To agree that it is the law but that I believe
> in it is of no moment, I am for NO BORDER CONTROLS, according to Mike
> Eisenstadt. Once you raised holy hell with someone for seeming to be
> anti-semitic. Now you are an admirer, and supporter, of the biggest
> anti-semite of them all--president Trump.* He believes that Jewish
> lawyers and accountants are the only ones he's willing to tolerate*. You
> are certainly a package of contradictions.
> Best,
> Frances
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:07 PM Michael Eisenstadt <
> mike.eisenstadt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You didn't come out and say it but actually you do say it: the
>> international law of Refugee status to anyone who claims it which was
>> ratified by the US should be the rule, which is to say let in anyone who
>> claims it and all the illegals are in fact claiming refugee status. You are
>> FOR NO BORDER CONTROLS. You are a Goodwhite. The consequences of letting
>> everyone in does not concern you - there's plenty of room, etc. Badwhites
>> who live in the neighborhoods with the the illegals may choose to disagree.
>> See ya' at the ballot box.
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/2019 11:42 AM, Frances Morey wrote:
>>
>> I am for processing them in to weed out criminal elements but we have
>> plenty of room for emergency immigrants, aka refugees. If we are full up
>> what is with all the anti-abortion rhetoric? Why aren't abortions and birth
>> control methods free?
>> Best,
>> Frances
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Michael Eisenstadt <
>> mike.eisenstadt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/19/2019 10:23 AM, Frances Morey wrote:
>>> > The Democratic Party is not for "Open Borders" yet the people who are
>>> > refugees are coming from countries in which our economic meddling have
>>> > made them unlivable.
>>>
>>> Double talk. Are you for letting them in or keeping them out? Don't
>>> equivocate. Yes or no?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/attachments/20190721/a02524b8/attachment.html>