[AGL] Modernism and DeBordist situation

[J. David Moriaty]

Oh, joy. Now a computer randomly generates scholarly papers that are 
totally meaningless, thereby saving much time and effort: 
www.elsewhere.org/pomo

This One titled Modernism and DeBordist situation:

The characteristic theme of la Tournier’s[1] model of Baudrillardist 
simulacra is the role of the artist as reader. Any number of 
deappropriations concerning modernism may be revealed.

However, Sartre suggests the use of Baudrillardist simulacra to attack 
sexist perceptions of class. Textual precultural theory holds that 
society, somewhat ironically, has significance, given that language is 
interchangeable with narrativity.

It could be said that Bataille promotes the use of Debordist situation 
to read truth. The failure, and subsequent collapse, of semantic theory 
prevalent in Fellini’s Satyricon emerges again in Amarcord. Etc, etc.

Or this one:

Forgetting Lacan: Socialism in the works of Glass

1. Textual semioticism and neocapitalist cultural theory

If one examines the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative, one is faced 
with a choice: either reject textual semioticism or conclude that 
narrativity is a legal fiction, given that cultural discourse is 
invalid. In a sense, Marx uses the term ‘neocapitalist cultural theory’ 
to denote not theory, but neotheory. Derrida suggests the use of 
textual semioticism to modify and read class.

The characteristic theme of the works of Stone is the bridge between 
sexual identity and society. But the subject is contextualised into a 
Baudrillardist simulation that includes reality as a reality. Many 
sublimations concerning textual semioticism may be found.

Therefore, if neocapitalist cultural theory holds, we have to choose 
between postconstructivist discourse and capitalist depatriarchialism. 
Foucault promotes the use of socialism to deconstruct sexism.

All yours to try at

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo