when did facts stop a good conspiracy theory ...yet again

[Pepi Plowman]

Yes, Twisty, I do.  Certainly I was speaking
metaphorically when I spoke of "down there." But we do
have a choice: either rise above it (traverse the
lines of light) or sink into it; above all, maintain
one's balance in avoiding pitfalls of hell--physical,
mental, emotional, or otherwise.

pep  

--- Harry Edwards <laughingwolf at ev1.net> wrote:

> ah Lady Pep, Your Highness, straight from His
> Lowness.  don't you 
> really think that the only hell is human-made right
> here on earth.      
>       your loyal subject,      twisty dodds
> 
> 
> On Jun 18, 2005, at 12:24 AM, Pepi Plowman wrote:
> 
> >
> > Reverend Bubba,
> >
> > You know what truth is: each person's is
> different.
> > What we see around us is maya, in any case.  My
> > percept tells me that the disparate realities we
> > experience on this earth do not gainsay the
> existence
> > of a certain balance, and that there exists a
> layer of
> > thin, light lines on which to traverse the abyss. 
> If
> > anything were hellish, it would be falling into
> dark
> > nothingness, down there in the void.
> >
> > So how does one keep a balance in a world gone
> insane?
> >
> > Look within, in silence.  Remember what Powell St.
> > John said.
> >
> > Her Highness Patricia Elaine
> > --- Clark Santos <clarksantos at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Mike,
> >>
> >> On the other ghetto list there has been a going
> >> discussion of the facts
> >> required for starting conspiracy arguments about
> all
> >> situations, so I
> >> thought some rather obvious building techniques
> and
> >> political
> >> connections needed to be highlighted. Hell I may
> >> start to write
> >> documentary exposes, as soon as my typing skills
> get
> >> better on these
> >> list practice sessions.
> >>
> >> This list has been much quicker lately and if I
> am
> >> having trouble with
> >> postings of some email I post to both.
> >>
> >> Clark
> >>
> >> On Jun 17, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Michael Eisenstadt
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Clark,
> >>
> >> Have you been to the WTC site? I did last summer.
> It
> >> had a relatively small footprint and was closely
> >> surrounded by highrise office buildings. When it
> >> came
> >> down it took out 2 of highrise office buildings
> with
> >> it and
> >> badly damaged another. You are just funning us to
> >> suggest that its designer put preinstalled
> >> explosives in
> >> two 100 storey buildings to blow them up (without
> >> anyone noticing of course during the 3 years it
> took
> >> to
> >> build them), you sly devil you.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: Clark Santos
> >> To: Remembrances of Austin Ghetto ; survivors'
> >> reminiscences about
> >> Austin Ghetto Daze in the 60s
> >> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:05 PM
> >> Subject: Re: when did facts stop a good
> conspiracy
> >> theory ...yet again
> >>
> >>
> >> When you construct a building, thats the time you
> >> put everything in it
> >> like toilets, sinks, wires, and lights because
> its
> >> much cheeper to do
> >> it that way. I observed all these processes while
> >> working my way
> >> through UT. Buildings are depreciated over a 30
> year
> >> period in the
> >> American way, so they probably installed the
> >> demolition charges and
> >> network of implosion devises while erecting it to
> >> make it cheeper and
> >> more efficient to get rid of the structure after
> it
> >> was used up.
> >>
> >> This makes perfect sense, we all know Republicans
> >> are for world trade
> >> and own or manage most of the large construction
> >> companies. Did Brown
> >> and Root build the world trade center? Are you or
> >> your family working
> >> in an efficient Republican constructed building?
> >>
> >> Watch for the new book "COULD YOU PERISH IN
> CHANEY
> >> ORCHESTRATED HELL
> >> FIRE" by the noted El Patron and sundry other
> >> experts. Soon at
> >> bookstores everywhere.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 17, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Wayne Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes and I agree except there is the theory that
> >> several women all
> >> turned on their , at once and shook things up a
> bit.
> >>  Keep an open mind
> >> is all I ask, keep an open mind ?.......w jr.
> >>
> >> Wayne Johnson <revbubba at EVILLAGES.ORG> wrote:From
> >> the Conspiracy
> >> website, the following "personal account" offered
> as
> >>
> >> "proof".
> >>
> >>
> >> "Seconds before the South Tower crumbled to its
> >> doom, I heard/felt a
> >> series of explosions. Same with the North Tower.
> >> There was no denying
> >> it,
> >> I could FEEL the vibrations of them like a small
> >> earthquake. Yet when I
> >> turned on the news none of the other eyewitnesses
> >> commented on this."
> >>
> >> Great. Some "feels" vibrations and then "knows"
> that
> >> these Must Have
> >> Been
> >> Caused by Explosive Devices! Stuff and nonsense.
> If
> >> you have mega-tonnes
> >> of structure beginning to fall, there would
> indeed
> >> by "vibrations" you
> >> could feel. Feet aren't exactly seismagraphs, and
> >> intuitions as to cause
> >> aren't exactly reasoned, scientific explanations.
> >>
> >> This kind of extemporaneous gibberish passed off
> as
> >> some kind of "proof"
> >> just makes eveyone's job more difficult in the
> >> business of finding out
> >> what happened and, perhaps, the extent of any
> >> conspiracy to destroy and
> >> defraud. It is about as useful as seeing an image
> >> the Virgin Mary in
> >> your
> >> skillet. It is utterly lacking in credibilty and
> is
> >> thus harmful to
> >> anyone
> >> really interested in "truth". What the hell is
> Truth
> >> anyway?
> >>
> >> Bush knows "Truth" becaue him talk to God him do.
> >>
> >> fooey.
> >>
> >> Rev. Bubba in a black mood
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> As Ewie says, "But since when did facts stop a
> >> good conspiracy theory."
> >>>
> >>> I couldn't agree more - those who really believe
> >> the wacko conspiracy
> 
=== message truncated ===