Jim is hypothetically pessimistic

[Michael Eisenstadt]

Jim Baldauf wrote in response to something Connie said:

"And how will it matter if the voting-machines and the 
election are rigged? Or if the nominee is named Joe Lieberman?
If voting made a difference, it would be illegal.
 
How's that for pessimism?
 
jb

It may be pessimist but it is also nonsense. 

As many many elections have made all the difference
(e.g. in the US Roosevelt over Hoover, Reagan over Carter,
Johnson over Goldwater, indeed Bush over Gore), the 
hypothetical is in willful disregard of common sense and 
historical knowledge.

Jim, I think you just like to type crazy-like at your
keyboard.

Mike