tyranny at home and abroad

telebob x telebob@hotmail.com
Sat, 31 May 2003 14:39:33 -0500


<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>I don't disagree with the idea that "tyranny is tyranny" and Mike is right in the sense that I should "never" use the word "always".&nbsp; One is sure to be wrong some of time whenever one uses either of thos words...or, one could very well be wrong, or not right, er, and so on.</P>
<P>Nevertheless,&nbsp;there are&nbsp;frequent instances where tyranny&nbsp;began abroad, usually with empire building or sheer military adventurism, and then spread back to home.&nbsp; I would think about Rome and Rome for only two examples.&nbsp; One, under the early empire that devolved into the tyranny of Caesars like Nero and Caligula, or the Rome of Mussolini that began&nbsp;its foreign tyranny in Africa, especially Ethiopia. (It would also be useful to define the word 'tyranny' and what contitutes a "tyrannical regime".&nbsp; Kind of&nbsp; like 'porno', I can't define it, but I know it when I see it.)&nbsp; But Mike is right, there are lots of tyrannies that have been perfectly content to stay within their own borders and beat their own wives and children.&nbsp; I will be more careful with my use of 'always' in the future.</P>
<P>tBob<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>----Original Message Follows---- 
<DIV></DIV>From: "Jon Ford" <JONMFORDSTER@HOTMAIL.COM>
<DIV></DIV>To: michaele@ando.pair.com, austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net 
<DIV></DIV>Subject: tyranny at home and abroad 
<DIV></DIV>Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:28:29 -0700 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>For once, I sort of agree with Michael: tyranny is tyranny, and if that is the mind-set of a ruler and his junta, it will be reflected simultaneously both in domestic and foreign policy. Bush's government has always been tyrannical and anti-rights, as seen in his cabinet choices and advisory circle. 9/11 was an attack from without, which Bush and Company used as an excuse to attack civil rights as well as to push their already tyrannical and exploitive Middle Eastern agenda much further. 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Jon 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: Michael Eisenstadt <MICHAELE@ANDO.PAIR.COM>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: Re: Fw: Byron Black has sent you a link from rrstar.com 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:45:11 -0500 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;telebob x wrote: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Well I LOVE the Israel bashing...bring on more of it. Their 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; administration deserves worse, just as does ours. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Well he brought this up 3 times in the speech without 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;going into the issue further than to condemn "Israel." 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I thought 3 times was excessive in one speech. For the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;rest I am sympathetic with his take on things. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;US does not belong in the Near EAst. for better or for 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;worse that's where Israel happens to be. 'twere better 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;had she gone to Uganda as was once broached back early 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;in the last century among Zionist circles, but she didnt. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;as i was told in the Chuck Wagon way back in the 60s 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;by an Arab student (after i had speechified on the subject) 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;"For the Arab the Jew is the stick up his ass." that 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;indeed was a useful piece of information. i had never 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;heard that from Moroccan acquaintances in the mid 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;50s in Paris but they were sorta middle-class doing the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;student bit there. When asked what they were studying 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;they invariable answered "des affaires" (business). 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Right on Chris Hedges! And thanks to the Rockford College 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Prez for stirring up the soup. Silence is deadly. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Tyranny at home always begins with tyranny abroad.... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;that last sentence is both wrong and ridiculous 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;(=laughable). unless you are trying to say that the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;tyrant is at first tyrannical abroad and is then 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;tyrannical at home? which is also ridiculous 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;i dare you to instance one example of tyranny at home 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;beginning with tyranny abroad. much less always. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>_________________________________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail 
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Add photos to your messages with  <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMVENUS/2749??PS=">MSN 8. </a> Get 2 months FREE*.</html>