shoe on the other foot - Ramsey Clark's points

[Jim Strong]

Actually we we just testing you and you PASSED!
Congratulations patriot EWI!!! Send us your complete
list of suspect professors and foreign-thinkers. There
could be a reward in it for a partiotic citizen like
yourself (as soon as we have reviewed your family
tree).
------------------------------------
Ashcroft's Avengers (uniforms in the works)
BlitzSkullKommandant Billy Jim
Ministerium des korrekten Gedankens
------------------------------------

--- Bill Irwin <billi@aloha.net> wrote:
> This is the most un-American junk thought I have
> ever heard.  This kind of
> thinking denies our American heritage of narrow
> minded, red-neck, provincial
> mind-set.  The very idea that any loyal American
> could possibly consider
> things from a foreigner view point is disgusting. 
> This kind of thinking
> could only lead one into becoming a terrorist or
> maybe even a liberal.  I
> suspect that you may be a university professor or
> some other kind of hippie
> liberal or maybe even an abortionist.  I suggest
> that you get a real
> American flag and start waving it and proclaiming
> President Bush as the
> greatest ever before the Homeland Security Police
> come knocking on your
> door.
> Bill Irwin
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Strong <strongjim@yahoo.com>
> To: <austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net>
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:46 AM
> Subject: shoe on the other foot - Ramsey Clark's
> points
> 
> 
> > Okay, here goes. Another way of looking at the
> > imported Gitmo Tali-banners / John Lind Walker
> > situation, it seems to me, is to assume the
> obverse
> > (although ridiculously remote) possibility.
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > Suppose the Taliban , who were at the time the
> ruling
> > power in Afghanistan, had prevailed over the US in
> a
> > battle on US soil. And imagine further that they
> then
> > scooped up selected US governmental leaders and
> > military personnel and had flown them back to a
> prison
> > camp at a military base of theirs on an island
> just
> > off Pakistan, and held them there pending summary
> > trial by a Moslem religious council under that
> body's
> > rules and procedures.
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > Add the fact that what they were being accused of
> was
> > violating the laws of Taliban-ruled Afghanistan -
> not
> > any US statutes. Like maybe death penalty
> punishable
> > adultery for some of the congressmen, and beating
> and
> > stoning for female US military personnel who
> didn't
> > wear the required veil and gunny sack in public
> during
> > the conflict.
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > Their arguement would be, of course, they were at
> war
> > with a country that had sent cruise missles
> reigning
> > down on them launched from offshore US submarines
> a
> > few years before. The US troops they took back to
> > Afghanistan would be charged with conspiracy  to
> > commit terrorist acts - while the Taliban
> continued to
> > hunt down a fleeing Prez Dubyah and Mullah Chaney
> in
> > the Piney Woods of East Texas.
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > How would we view it?
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > Billy Jim
> >
> > =====
> > The peace of the cosmos is infinite motion
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
> > http://auctions.yahoo.com
> >
> 


=====
The peace of the cosmos is infinite motion

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com