value added?
Jon Ford
jonmfordster@hotmail.com
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:20:19 -0700
Bob, I thought your "value added" remark to be truly a classic. Let's look
at some facts: 1) a huge number of the products you mention are not really
"value added" by US consumptionsince they (or most of the parts used in
the products) are actually manufactured in the Third World under US control
and ownership. This means the Third World is having to build big power
plants to provide the modern-style factories to make them, and of course
provide the child labor for pennies an hour to crank these fine products
out. The energy consumption of these countries (along with atmospheric and
water pollution)has skyrocketed in recent years, as has the demand for
natural resources to make the products and fuel the machines.
2) Then, getting even wilder, many of these goods are imported to the US,
some being sold here as US products (value added "over there, " making them
cheaper), reexported to the Third World with fancy brand tags on them,
higher prices, big profit for the US. Only the middle or upper class Third
Worlders can afford said products, but the poor get something a few years
behind the times, yearning for that upper middle-class world that the
products can magically transport them to. We are really just outsourcing
what wouldn't be tolerated here in terms of huge energy consumption and
pollution (of course, we are still by far the largest consumers per capita
of energy and products of all kinds).
3) What's also happening now in the Third World (well, let's say most of
the world) is that prices are going way up because of increasing energy
coasts, less land in cultivation, etc.-- the pennies a day the factory
workers make don't really cover all this very well. So the international PR
firms of which you seem proud have to work really hard to create
hyper-consumerism in Third World countries, to open up new markets
everywhere so that very poor people will be motivated to scrimp and save
to buy, say, a US brand toaster which they could probably do without-- they
could warm their bread (if they could afford any) some other way.
Jon "the Zen saint" Ford
>
>Well I noticed something interesting too....the fact that you totally
>ignored the point of my original post and fixed on the 'tone' of the post
>rather than the simple idea that the USA is not quite the energy and
>resource hog that many of the stats imply since so many of the raw
>materials
>imported have 'value added' and then are re-exported to the world.
>
>Perhaps you would care to address that issue?
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp