bombs for security

telebob x telebob98@hotmail.com
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 01:20:45 +0000


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_3f13_7633_629f
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Well Roger....we were not able to 'bomb our way into security' during 
VietNam....it is true...but this is not VietNam.  And the big mistake we 
made during the Gulf War was in not pursuing our advantage and ridding Iraq 
of Saddam.  Yes...it would have been a huge headache, and it would have 
offended some of our allies, but it is what should have been done...we can 
see that with 20/20 hindsight.

I agree with some of the Richard Holbrooke types who say that what is needed 
now, and quickly, is a UN peacekeeping team to come in and impose order and 
try to get a functioning government going in Afg.  Headed up by Turks and 
other troops from Muslim countries.

As for bombing our way into secure worlds....well like it or not, bombs won 
us peace in WWII.  Bombs are only part of the formula as you well know and 
glibly avoid. The Irish Times Vincent Browne piece is utter 
hogwash....everything in it is 'might','may' and 'could'....all total 
speculation.  Sure, it is a dangerous world. It always has been.  Finally 
the USA is (re) awakening to that fact....that someone might want to blow up 
the salad bar at the Golden Corral is a fact that Americans will have to 
face...and their "God Bless America" signs will not change that.  Welcome to 
the crowded mess of today.

The self censorship you mention regarding the Ft Walton Beach paper 
censoring the civilian casualties is perfectly normal.  When the feeling in 
the USA is running 90% for the war...an editor would have to be a fool to 
antagonize his readership by appearing to be too sensitive to collateral 
damage.

I have been watching a lot of international TV here in CR  (Italian Chinese 
and Chilean TV are on cable here and they show the same footage as CNN of 
the Kabul population being vastly relieved at the fall of the Taliban) It is 
sad to see any noncombatant die....but like you said, breaking eggs to get 
omlettes....though I prefer the analogy of the pain a person goes through in 
surgery.  There is pain and suffering, but the malignancy must be removed.

And I know you will say the Taliban and AmeriKa haters are still out 
there...sure, and there are some Tim McVeighs and Ted Kazynskis too...still 
out there.

I do not like our policy regarding the Palistinians. I do not like 
supporting a corrupt regime in Saudi Arabia.  Etc...but did you know they 
are now demonstrating in Iran in favor of the USA and against their own 
Mullahs?  Things change all the time. We are not always the world bad guy 
you portray. I see an awful lot of people want to join our little country 
and 'way of life' however perverse you think it is.

I am no fan of the present amoral corporate dominance.  I think we have to 
do something to harness these bastards.  I like the plans talked about by 
Arianna Huffington.  I loved the Bill Moyers speech that Richard Smith sent 
along yesterday. (Read it if you haven't already). But I do believe in the 
ideals of the USA, if not the reality of what we are presently...and though 
you do not like to admit it...so do you.

And I don't care if we run out of oil.  We will find something else...when 
it makes economic sense to do so.  Our ingenuity is really remarkable. I 
personally like geothermal...since I am down here in the land of volcanoes.  
Solar is nice too and so on...but why do you have to be such a constant nay 
saying worry wart? If we listnened to you we would all buy bicycles and go 
live in dirt yurts or something.

Boil boil toil and trouble....fire burn...etc..eye of newt (good idea)

And by the way, I do not have to hide behind Christopher Hitchens 
journalistic skirts.  I can defend myself and my opinions just fine thank 
you. Just because I like P.J. O'Rourke and Hitchens doesn't make me their 
surrogate.

and so on,

Teleobob


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

------=_NextPart_000_3f13_7633_629f
Content-Type: message/rfc822

>From austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:58:37 -0800
Received: from [216.92.1.92] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBDBD71B800B440043794D85C015C0AB90; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:34:01 -0800
Received: from pairlist.net (localhost.pair.com [127.0.0.1])
	by pairlist.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C460653594; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:25:50 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Received: from hotmail.com (f59.law7.hotmail.com [216.33.237.59])
	by pairlist.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2B453589
	for <austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net>; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:19:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:19:51 -0800
Received: from 206.52.126.61 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:19:38 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [206.52.126.61]
From: "Jon Ford" <jonmfordster@hotmail.com>
To: telebob98@hotmail.com, austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Subject: Re: why sudden silence?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Message-ID: <F59VADuDKF3dZZDenfX0001610f@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2001 20:19:51.0213 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1570DD0:01C16E12]
Sender: austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net
Errors-To: austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net
X-BeenThere: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:austin-ghetto-list-request@pairlist.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/austin-ghetto-list>,
	<mailto:austin-ghetto-list-request@pairlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: survivors' reminiscences about Austin Ghetto Daze in the 60s <austin-ghetto-list.pairlist.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/austin-ghetto-list>,
	<mailto:austin-ghetto-list-request@pairlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/austin-ghetto-list/>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:19:38 -0800

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Well, Bob--let's just say I'm "waiting and seeing." Trying to be hopeful. The US has a good opportunity in Afghanistan, as does the UN and the surrounding Arab states.We could see some improved international cooperation coming out of this.&nbsp; But has Muslim fundamentalism "gone away" beause we drove out the Taliban like an elephant stomping a flea? No. Has terrorism? Nope. Have we dealt with the way our corporations exploit people around the world in the name of&nbsp; free trade?&nbsp; Not a clue. So what have we accomplished? We've given up some of our civil lierties at home-- will we get them back? Don't count on it.Our economy is in the toilet, and we've fired up a really big budget deficit, with no end in sight to the spending on war and corporate bail-outs. Not altogether a great time to be an American, but we sure showed those no good Talibaners a thingt or three, ha ha ha!</P>
<P>Jon<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: "telebob x" <TELEBOB98@HOTMAIL.COM>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: why sudden silence?
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:14:05 +0000
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Gee, what has happened to the usual drumbeat of defeat from Roger,
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Jon, et
<DIV></DIV>&gt;al ? Shocking! The USA did something right again. And not for the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;wrong
<DIV></DIV>&gt;reasons either.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;tele
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Ha ha ha
<DIV></DIV>&gt;by
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Christopher Hitchens
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Wednesday November 14, 2001
<DIV></DIV>&gt;The Guardian
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;There was a time in my life when I did a fair bit of
<DIV></DIV>&gt;work for the tempestuous Lucretia Stewart, then editor
<DIV></DIV>&gt;of the American Express travel magazine, Departures.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Together, we evolved a harmless satire of the slightly
<DIV></DIV>&gt;drivelling style employed by the journalists of
<DIV></DIV>&gt;tourism. "Land of Contrasts" was our shorthand for it.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;("Jerusalem: an enthralling blend of old and new."
<DIV></DIV>&gt;"South Africa: a harmony in black and white."
<DIV></DIV>&gt;"Belfast, where ancient meets modern.") It was as you
<DIV></DIV>&gt;can see, no difficult task. I began to notice a few
<DIV></DIV>&gt;weeks ago that my enemies in the "peace" movement had
<DIV></DIV>&gt;decided to borrow from this tattered style book. The
<DIV></DIV>&gt;mantra, especially in the letters to this newspaper,
<DIV></DIV>&gt;was: "Afghanistan, where the world's richest country
<DIV></DIV>&gt;rains bombs on the world's poorest country."
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Poor fools. They should never have tried to beat me at
<DIV></DIV>&gt;this game. What about, "Afghanistan, where the world's
<DIV></DIV>&gt;most open society confronts the world's most closed
<DIV></DIV>&gt;one"? "Where American women pilots kill the men who
<DIV></DIV>&gt;enslave women." "Where the world's most indiscriminate
<DIV></DIV>&gt;bombers are bombed by the world's most accurate ones."
<DIV></DIV>&gt;"Where the largest number of poor people applaud the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;bombing of their own regime." I could go on. (I think
<DIV></DIV>&gt;number four may need a little work.) But there are
<DIV></DIV>&gt;some suggested contrasts for the "doves" to paste into
<DIV></DIV>&gt;their scrapbook. Incidentally, when they look at their
<DIV></DIV>&gt;scrapbooks they will be able to re-read themselves
<DIV></DIV>&gt;saying things like, "The bombing of Kosovo is driving
<DIV></DIV>&gt;the Serbs into the arms of Milosevic."
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;If the silly policy of a Ramadan pause had been
<DIV></DIV>&gt;adopted, the citizens of Kabul would have still been
<DIV></DIV>&gt;under a regime of medieval cruelty, and their
<DIV></DIV>&gt;oppresssors would have been busily regrouping, not
<DIV></DIV>&gt;praying. Anyhow, what a damn-fool proposal to start
<DIV></DIV>&gt;with. I don't stop insulting the Christian coalition
<DIV></DIV>&gt;at Eastertime. Come Yom Kippur I tend to step up my
<DIV></DIV>&gt;scornful remarks about Zionism. Whatever happened to
<DIV></DIV>&gt;the robust secularism that used to help characterise
<DIV></DIV>&gt;the left? And why is it suddenly only the injured
<DIV></DIV>&gt;feelings of Muslims that count? A couple of years ago,
<DIV></DIV>&gt;the same people were striking pompous attitudes about
<DIV></DIV>&gt;the need to avoid offending Serbian and therefore
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Russian Orthodox sensitivities. Except that those
<DIV></DIV>&gt;sensitive people, or their leaders, were engaged in
<DIV></DIV>&gt;putting the Muslims of Europe to the sword...
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;There's no pleasing some people, but as a charter
<DIV></DIV>&gt;supporter of CND I can remember a time when the peace
<DIV></DIV>&gt;movement was not an auxiliary to dictators and
<DIV></DIV>&gt;aggressors in trouble. Looking at some of the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;mind-rotting tripe that comes my way from much of
<DIV></DIV>&gt;today's left, I get the impression that they go to bed
<DIV></DIV>&gt;saying: what have I done for Saddam Hussein or good
<DIV></DIV>&gt;old Slobodan or the Taliban today?
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Well, ha ha ha, and yah, boo. It was obvious from the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;very start that the United States had no alternative
<DIV></DIV>&gt;but to do what it has done. It was also obvious that
<DIV></DIV>&gt;defeat was impossible. The Taliban will soon be
<DIV></DIV>&gt;history. Al-Qaida will take longer. There will be
<DIV></DIV>&gt;other mutants to fight. But if, as the peaceniks like
<DIV></DIV>&gt;to moan, more Bin Ladens will spring up to take his
<DIV></DIV>&gt;place, I can offer this assurance: should that be the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;case, there are many many more who will also spring up
<DIV></DIV>&gt;to kill him all over again. And there are more of us
<DIV></DIV>&gt;and we are both smarter and nicer, as well as
<DIV></DIV>&gt;surprisingly insistent that our culture demands
<DIV></DIV>&gt;respect, too.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;· Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;_________________________________________________________________
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
<DIV></DIV>&gt;http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>



------=_NextPart_000_3f13_7633_629f--